If you refer a fellow publisher to VigLink, you will earn a referral fee equal to 10% of their earnings for the first year. Their earnings will not be affected.

So if you find VigLink valuable, please, tell your friends. Our customers know how much time and energy it can save, and how effortless it is to make money from the content they’re already writing. Help us spread the word and you will share in the success of the publishers you refer.

Naturally, any link you create on a site with VigLink installed is automatically active in the referral program. Go ahead and write a blog post and link to viglink.com, and VigLink does the rest. If anyone clicks that link, signs up, and generates revenue, you will get a bonus of 10% of that revenue. If you want to promote us on twitter, facebook, or somewhere that is not your site use the link provided on the Account tab. Those signups and earnings will also be tracked.

As always, if you have thoughts, comments or concerns, please don’t hesitate to email us at support@viglink.com.

Galen Thompson

Relationship Manager, VigLink

There’s been some noise in the blogosphere over the discovery that Posterous had installed VigLink and was utilizing it to monetize the latent commercial traffic on their platform. We’ve avoided commenting until our customer decided what they wanted to do in order to avoid interfering in what is no doubt a sensitive matter for them.

VigLink leaves decisions around disclosure up to our customers. Our terms of service require publishers to comply with all applicable local regulations but as these are still new and evolving, we leave it to our customer to judge what is most appropriate for their specific communities and their local legal jurisdiction.

In the coming weeks we will be working to make it easier for publishers to disclose the use of VigLink through branded badges a publisher may add to their site, linking to a clear explanation of what we do and offering the ability for a permanent customer opt-out. However, the ultimate decisions on how best to disclose will remain in the hands of our customers.

A few points of technical clarification:

• We and our competitors do not affect the PageRank of a page. We have received assurances from Google that this is so (we are backed by Google Ventures) and Danny Sullivan has written that he’s received the same guidance from Google. Our publishers who watch these things closely report no change in PageRank as a result of using our code.
• Posterous was not overwriting any existing affiliate links. Neither are 99% of our customers. The option is available for customers who would like it (those who run forums prohibiting commercial links for example) but very few have done so.
• We work hard not to “break the web” – we don’t use redirects, ad blockers work as intended and even if our servers are unreachable the page continues to behave as expected. We’ve gotten reports that middle clicks under some circumstances were mis-behaving and so we’ve disabled all modified click rewriting until we get this issue sorted out.
• We also work closely with merchants and affiliate networks to ensure we are meeting the requirements of their programs. Some merchants have “blacklists” or “whitelists” and we only affiliate links from publishers that those merchants find acceptable.
• Any link can be marked “not rewriteable” by adding the attribute rel=”norewrite” to the anchor tag. We will add a global tag that allows a page author to easily opt the whole page out of being rewritten.
• Offering the ability for our customers to share the revenue with their customers is something we are investigating. There are numerous technical and business challenges involved but we hope to be able to offer this ability where appropriate in the future.

VigLink believes that sites that facilitate commercial activity are contributing to the ecosystem and unobtrusively deriving revenue from that activity is entirely appropriate. We recognize that community expectations about what is acceptable will vary widely and we think decisions about what’s most appropriate in a given context are best left to our customers. We are working to provide even more tools for all our customers meet the expectations of their community.

If you have comments or concerns about VigLink, you can contact us at feedback@viglink.com or me personally at oroup@viglink.com. We look forward to hearing from you.

Oliver Roup

Co-founder / CEO, VigLink

Amazon and the Colorado legislature have created quite a stir in the affiliate marketing community recently. Colorado passed a new tax law affecting online commerce and Amazon responded by terminating its affiliate relationship with all Colorado affiliates. You can find more information here. Also available is copy of the letter from Amazon to its Colorado affiliates. This is a broad debate with larger implications for online retailers, but the the real hardship is borne by the Colorado affiliates. Other laws affecting the taxation of online commerce have passed in New York, North Carolina, and Rhode Island with the similar results — in some cases the dropping of hard working affiliates. Laws have also been considered in California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Minnesota, and Tennessee.

VigLink may be able to help. Affiliate marketing is a profession for some, a hobby for others, and an important source of income for many.  One of our goals as a company is to improve the status quo in affiliate marketing, and we are working to make affiliate marketing easier and more profitable for publishers while bringing value to the merchants and protecting their ability to manage their brand and make their own business decisions.  Contact us for more information info [at] viglink dot com.

Fred is so dead on, it’s a little frightening. About 1/2 dozen people had sent me the post within a few hours. The quality of the comments on his blog are also among the best I’ve ever seen. We’re only days away from a public announce and the temptation to jump in here is almost overwhelming.

Obviously we’re not in display, but a bunch of what he writes about resonates for us.

A couple notable things about this post:

• He talks about the “buy side” and “sell side” of the market, something we haven’t seen enough of and something we talked a lot about when we were out pitching for funding.
• He uses the word vigorish. Awesome. Publishers should get their (fair) cut.
• He does some simple models to identify that publishers are being underpaid for the value they’re driving.
• He talks about fragmentation among publishers as a key source of weakness.

Although he’s talking about display, I think a lot of his insights apply to us. The market is ripe.

For 15 years we’ve been training webmasters to think in pageviews. How many do you have? What are they worth? How can you get more? The fact that nobody can agree on the answer to that question is a symptom of the fact that the pageview does not tell the whole story.

Chris Dixon (of whom we’re big fans) has an awesome recent blog post: “Why Content Sites are Getting Ripped Off”

He cites one of his readers Tim Ogilvie defining the difference between “intent generators” and “intent harvesters” and makes the basic point that only the harvesters get paid and that this is a problem that publishers need to correct. He’s absolutely right and he says it more cleanly than anyone I’ve seen so far. I’m going to be pointing my customers to his blog.

As a publisher, I want to know:

• Where am I sending my users?
• More importantly, what are they doing once they get there?
• How much value is that driving?
• How can I claim some of that value for the traffic I’m providing?

Every time a click leaves a publishers site, value is being created. We call this event “the outclick”. Publishers should be able to claim some of that value. But how do you measure it? How do you “claim” it? These are the problems VigLink will address. Exciting times…